Tradition says that Bernard Gilpin (rector of Houghton 1558) took a cutting from the thorn in the grounds of Glastonbury Abbey, which according to legend had been planted there by Joseph of Arimethea. Gilpin planted the thorn in the rectory grounds. Frank Rushford, in his book of c1950 described the thorn tree as "crabbed and gnarled with age, and supported here and there with timber, and yet still in a wonderful state of preservation. It is a historic object of which Houghtonians are not a little proud". Tree no longer there.
Site Type: Broad
Feature
SITEDESC
Tradition says that Bernard Gilpin (rector of Houghton 1557 to 1583) took a cutting from the thorn in the grounds of Glastonbury Abbey, which according to legend had been planted there by Joseph of Arimethea. Gilpin planted the thorn in the rectory grounds, north of the rectory (HER 264). In 1870 the tree was described as being '11 1/4 feet in length at 2 feet from the ground'. A drawing of the tree in 1938 shows the main branch supported by timber bracings. Frank Rushford, in his book of c1950 described the thorn tree as "crabbed and gnarled with age, and supported here and there with timber, and yet still in a wonderful state of preservation. It is a historic object of which Houghtonians are not a little proud". The tree died in 1992 due to vandalism. Cuttings were taken from the tree by council workers and planted in Washington. There is/was a plaque on the site in Rectory Park. Dated C16th.
Site Name
Rectory Park, Gilpin Thorn
Site Type: Specific
Natural Feature
HER Number
7850
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
Frank H. Rushford, c1950, Houghton le Spring: A History, pp 29-30; Paul Lanagan, 2013, Houghton-le-Spring Rectory - A Walk Around the Grounds (www.houghtonlespring.org.uk); Paul Lanagan, 2006-2013, The Gilpin Thorn, www.houghtonlespring.org.uk; Northern Archaeological Associates Ltd. 2014, Rectory Park, Houghton-le-Spring, Archaeological Assessment and Building Recording
SURVIVAL
None
YEAR1
2005
English, British
Class
Water Supply and Drainage
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
Newcastle
Easting
1866
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ16SE
MATERIAL
Sandstone
MONTH1
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
6447
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Lemington
Description
Quay walls survive well between the site of the staithes, adjacent to the ironworks managers house and a point immediately south-east of the ironworks (approx. NZ 1847 eastwards to NZ 1866 6447). These walls probably pre-date the construction of a channel across Blaydon Haugh by the Tyne Improvement Commission in the 1850s which created the Gut and led to a waning of industrial development at Lemington (the ironworks already being closed/in decline by this time). The Gut survives as a silted cul-de-sac of the Tyne, preserving the quayside walls alodn with fragmentary remains of staithes and, probably, sunken boats in its silt.
Site Type: Broad
Water Regulation Installation
SITEDESC
Quay walls survive well between the site of the staithes, adjacent to the ironworks managers house and a point immediately south-east of the ironworks (approx. NZ 1847 eastwards to NZ 1866 6447). These walls probably pre-date the construction of a channel across Blaydon Haugh by the Tyne Improvement Commission in the 1850s which created the Gut and led to a waning of industrial development at Lemington (the ironworks already being closed/in decline by this time). The Gut survives as a silted cul-de-sac of the Tyne, preserving the quayside walls along with fragmentary remains of staithes and, probably, sunken boats in its silt.
This site was nominated for the Newcastle local list in 2022.
Site Name
Lemington Gut, quay walls
Site Type: Specific
Flood Defences
HER Number
7849
Form of Evidence
Structure
Sources
The Archaeological Practice, 1999, Newburn Haugh: Archaeological Assessment, pp.28, 36 & 41. Unpublished report for WSP Environmental; Scott Wilson, 2010, Scotswood Road, Lemington - Archaeological Assessment
YEAR1
2005
English, British
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
COMP2
Claire MacRae
DAY1
22
DAY2
12
District
Newcastle
Easting
1862
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ16SE
MONTH1
11
MONTH2
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
6448
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Lemington
Description
In 1999 photographs were taken of a brick and stone building with pan-tiled roof and recessed north-west corner wall, situated next to the quay walls of Lemington Gut, south of the ironworks site. Its date is uncertain, but it seems to have been part of the ironworks site and may pre-date it. It is shown on a map of 1844 (AP 1999, p.17), on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map and in a truncated form on the 2nd edition of 1899. This enigmatic structure, latterly a stable, was pulled down sometime between 1999 and 2003, but its foundations are likely to survive.
Site Type: Broad
Metal Industry Site
SITEDESC
In 1999 photographs were taken of a brick and stone building with pan-tiled roof and recessed north-west corner wall, situated next to the quay walls of Lemington Gut, south of the ironworks site. Its date is uncertain, but it seems to have been part of the ironworks site and may pre-date it. It is shown on a map of 1844 (AP 1999, p.17), on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey map and in a truncated form on the 2nd edition of 1899. This enigmatic structure, latterly a stable, was pulled down sometime between 1999 and 2003, but its foundations are likely to survive.
Site Name
Lemington Gut, brick and stone buildings
Site Type: Specific
Iron Works
HER Number
7848
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
The Archaeological Practice, 1999, Newburn Haugh: Archaeological Assessment, pp.28, 36 & 41. Unpublished report for WSP Environmental; Scott Wilson, 2010, Scotswood Road, Lemington - Archaeological Assessment
YEAR1
2005
YEAR2
2014
English, British
Class
Commercial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
Sunderland
Easting
3271
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ35NW
MONTH1
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
5527
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Cox Green
Description
A public House (name obscure on map) is marked at this location on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey plan, surveyed c.1855.
Site Type: Broad
Eating and Drinking Establishment
SITEDESC
A public House (name obscure on map) is marked at this location on the 1st edition Ordnance Survey plan, surveyed c.1855.
Site Name
Cox Green, Public House
Site Type: Specific
Public House
HER Number
7847
Form of Evidence
Extant Building
Sources
1st edition Ordnance Survey map, surveyed c.1855.
Inkster K, 1999, Barmston & Coxgreen: Archaeological Assessment. Unpublished report by the Archaeology Department, Tyne & Wear Museums for Northumbrian Water. (T&W HER 1999, Box 23/32)
YEAR1
2005
English, British
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
Sunderland
Easting
3642
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ34NE
MONTH1
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
4847
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
Great Eppleton
Description
This quarry appears on the 2nd edition Ordnance Survey map of 1897. IT contained a small gunpowder store, the only permanent structure. The quarry had closed by 1920 but is still visible.
Site Type: Broad
Mineral Extraction Site
SITEDESC
This quarry appears on the 2nd edition Ordnance Survey map of 1897. It contained a small gunpowder store, the only permanent structure. The quarry had closed by 1920 but is still visible.
Site Name
Curlew Hope Quarry
Site Type: Specific
Quarry
HER Number
7846
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
The Archaeological Practice, 1999, Eppleton Reclamation Scheme: Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Assessment, p.22 & Fig. 2. Unpublished report for Hall Construction Services Ltd. (T&W HER 1999, Box 21A/2)
YEAR1
2005
English, British
AREA_STAT
Conservation Area
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
Crossref
955, 11864
DAY1
11
District
S Tyneside
Easting
3679
Grid ref figure
8
LANDUSE
Building
Map Sheet
NZ36SE
MATERIAL
Brick
MONTH1
08
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
6124
General Period
20TH CENTURY
Specific Period
20th Century 1901 to 2000
Place
East Boldon
Description
A row of shops and houses with an adjoining former Co-op branch. Red brick. Spoilt by the loss of some front gardens to concrete parking. The traditional shopfront, window and other joinery is painted deep green. The first floor windows are uPVC. There is a detailed brick boundary wall at the top of Sunderland Road.
Site Type: Broad
Terrace
SITEDESC
A row of shops and houses with an adjoining former Co-op branch. Red brick. Spoilt by the loss of some front gardens to concrete parking. The traditional shopfront, window and other joinery is painted deep green. The first floor windows are uPVC. There is a detailed brick boundary wall at the top of Sunderland Road.
Site Name
1 to 4 St. Bede's
Site Type: Specific
Terrace
HER Number
7845
Form of Evidence
Extant Building
Sources
North of England Civic Trust on behalf of South Tyneside Council, February 2006, East Boldon Conservation Area Character Appraisal; East Boldon School Centenary 1885-1985; M. Linge, The Story of Boldon; A. Middleton, 1983, Boldon's Witness in Church and Community; N. Pevsner, 1953, The Buildings of England: County Durham; W. Wilson, 1935, A Short History of Boldon
YEAR1
2009
English, British
AREA_STAT
Conservation Area
Class
Domestic
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
Crossref
955, 11864
DAY1
11
District
S Tyneside
Easting
3672
Grid ref figure
8
LANDUSE
Building
Map Sheet
NZ36SE
MATERIAL
Brick
MONTH1
08
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
6121
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Victorian 1837 to 1901
Place
East Boldon
Description
Late Victorian red brick houses. No. 3 is later and of different proportions, form and materials. No. 2 has a painted front. The original windows and classical door cases survive. The boundary wall along Whitburn Terrace is old and buttressed.
Site Type: Broad
Terrace
SITEDESC
Late Victorian red brick houses. No. 3 is later and of different proportions, form and materials. No. 2 has a painted front. The original windows and classical door cases survive. The boundary wall along Whitburn Terrace is old and buttressed.
Site Name
1 to 3 Somerset Terrace
Site Type: Specific
Terrace
HER Number
7844
Form of Evidence
Extant Building
Sources
North of England Civic Trust on behalf of South Tyneside Council, February 2006, East Boldon Conservation Area Character Appraisal; East Boldon School Centenary 1885-1985; M. Linge, The Story of Boldon; A. Middleton, 1983, Boldon's Witness in Church and Community; N. Pevsner, 1953, The Buildings of England: County Durham; W. Wilson, 1935, A Short History of Boldon
YEAR1
2009
English, British
ADDITINF
N
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
22
District
Gateshead
Easting
2749
Grid ref figure
8
Map Sheet
NZ26SE
MONTH1
11
Grid Reference
NZ
Northing
6300
General Period
POST MEDIEVAL
Specific Period
Hanoverian 1714 to 1837
Place
Gateshead
Description
A line of 18th century coal pits is suggested at this location on the basis of early map evidence.
Site Type: Broad
Coal Mining Site
SITEDESC
A line of 18th century coal pits is suggested at this location on the basis of early map evidence.
Site Name
Gateshead, coal pits
Site Type: Specific
Coal Workings
HER Number
7843
Form of Evidence
Documentary Evidence
Sources
NCAS, 1998, Felling Riverside: Friar’s Goose Remediation Scheme: Investigation of ‘Outfall E’ for Environmental Technology Consultants, Fig. 3. Unpublished report. (T&W HER 1998, Box 20/46)
YEAR1
2005
English, British
Class
Industrial
COMP1
Jennifer Morrison
DAY1
21
District
Gateshead
Easting
244
Grid ref figure
6
Map Sheet
NZ25NW
MONTH1
03
Grid Reference
NZ
NMRNUMBER
NZ 26 SW 238
Northing
598
General Period
20TH CENTURY
Specific Period
Mid 20th Century 1933 to 1966
Place
Team Valley
Description
The Team Valley Trading Estate was established in 1936 - one of the first purpose built industrial estates in the country. It was built as a response to the failure of traditional industry in Gateshead. Nearly £2,000,000 of central government funding was awarded under the Special Areas (Development and Improvement) Act of 1934 into economic regeneration to create a clean pleasant light industrial environment. The resulting TVTE intended to provide employment for 15,000 workers with 15 years. It was mastermined by William G Holford under Colonel Kenelm C Appleyard, formerly of Birtley Iron and Engineering Works, who headed a new company, North Eastern Trading Estates Ltd. Constructed began in 1936 and the estate was formally opened by King George VI three years later. The 650 acre estate is recognised by Pevsner as a remarkable example of planned architecture by W. Holford. The building of the estate involved extensive reclamation works and culverting of the River Team which originally was decorated with trellises and climbing roses. The estate was designed on a grid plan and consists of wide roads and verges. The double row of Wheatley elm on Kingsway North is perhaps the most significant landscape feature. Originally factories were encouraged to create their own garden areas, although sadly there are no remains. In the late 1980s the estate underwent a major environmental improvement scheme in an attempt to attract new development. This scheme by Brian Clouston & Partners reinforced many of the original features, including the replanting of the elm avenue with lime as well as solving unsightly late C20 problems such as the containment of car parking and storage yards. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Team Valley Trading Estate was a pioneering solution to the economic depression of the 1930s as the first government industrial estate; with its sponsoring body the first publicly funded Estate Company. Various sites were considered, but the Team Valley was eventually chosen, mainly due to the topography of the site and the excellent transport links by road and rail. The 700 acre site, designed by William G Holford (later Lord Holford and only 29 at the time), was transformed from boggy pasture land using colliery waste. The main north-south axis road, Kingsway, was 2 miles long, and at the time the widest in England. In the vast space was included two 24’ carriageways, with a landscaped strip 24’ wide between, bordered by 4’ grass verges and 6’ cycle tracks, privet hedging and 8’ footpaths. Services were laid in the verges in order to facilitate easy and unobtrusive access. The architect showed a great deal of foresight, as in addition to this generous provision, he ensured all factories were to be set back 30’ from the pavement to allow for ample parking for motor cars, which were rare at the time. Together these would have given a feeling of great openness that was very modern compared with the cramped alleys familiar in the centre of Gateshead. The landscaping also created an attractive setting for the brave new world of light industry, contrasting with the unwholesome and contaminated setting of the heavy industrial past. The intention to look positively to the future is clear. On Kingsway North, a double row of Wheatley Elm is of particular landscape interest, but when the site was officially opened these were but a small part of the planting scheme. 10,000 plants and bulbs were introduced along the full length of Kingsway, including tulips, daffodils, palms and ferns, giving an exotic feel. A narrower east-west axis connected Low Fell and the Ravensworth Coach Road. The dirty River Team (known locally as ‘The Gut’) was cleaned up and canalised to improve the environment, in what was, at the time, the longest river rectification system in England. It was culverted for 100 yards in the centre, but for the first mile, at the south end of Kingsway, its course was diverted into a deep concrete channel, which replaced the central grass strip to the northern end. With aesthetic as well as safety concerns, wire mesh covered these concrete channels, and roses and other climbers were planted to enhance the area. A football ground, tennis courts and a large playing field were originally included in the design, to allow for the recreational and exercise needs of workers. Even the secondary streets were named after elements of the natural world (many trees, but also some birds etc.), presumably in order to bolster the connection with a healthy, natural environment. It is of great importance, too, that a quirkily irregular historic plot known as Twenty Pound Close was retained in the design, with its distinctive woodland character.
There is now a garden behind St George’s House, but more gardens were apparently originally envisaged that were never laid out. This is likely to have been due to the onset of war, as many of the factories were requisitioned and labour and financial resources became restricted. The landscaping scheme, though, remains impressive and is an interesting design of its time, with great potential for restoration and enhancement into the future. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Trading Estate came out of the central government’s Special Areas initiative, commissioned to address the problems in those areas worst hit. It was hoped that the introduction of Light Industry would offset the decline in heavy industries. Although there are no gardens as originally envisaged, a renewal scheme in the late 1980s in sympathy with the original design included replanting of avenues of trees and removal of inappropriate intrusions. MATERIALS / SPECIES Concrete, lawn, Wheatley Elm DESIGNER W G Holford
Roads/services George Wimpey & Co DATES Built 1936 Opened by George VI 22/02/1939 LOCAL LIST
SITEASS
It is easy to forget the signifiance of the Team Valley Trading Estate. Its architecture is modest, its layout more suburban than heroic, but the contrast with what had gone before and the boldness of the experiment - it was intended to bring social stability and a new economic base to the area - should not be overlooked. Nearly two miles (3.2km) long, it was the size of a small town, with what was then one of the widest roads in the country, Kingsway, which has the canalised River Team as its spine. The estate was attractively landscaped; football pitches were laid out on vacant parts; and it was hoped that its park-like appearance would engender leisure use. At the centre, North Eastern Trading Estates Ltd built an extensive crescent-shaped headquarters with detached blocks containing a bank and post office. Factories were provided in three standard sizes, the largest was 14, 085 sq ft (1,308.5 sq m) and some bespoke factories were also built for individual companies. "Nursery" factories of 1,500 sq ft were built in blocks of four, available for a weekly rent of only £1. They were intended to nurture small industrial ventures without much capital. The Second World War halted expansion and most of the factories were turned to war production. After the war, commercial building started again. One of the best new bespoke factories was specifically designed for Sigmund Pumps (founded in 1937 by a Czechoslovakian refugee, Miroslav Sigmund) on Queensway, by Yorke, Rosenberg and Mardall in 1948. Another factory was designed for Armstrong Cork on Kingsway by D McIntyre in the same year. A two-phase processed cheese plant was built by Kavli of Norway (1957 and 1961) on Kingsway and the British Road Services depot on Earlsway. The initial success of the Team Valley Trading Estate is difficult to judge. Factory take-up was swift but much of the huge area remained unused for a long time. Today most of the vacant plots have been built upon. A handful of first-generation factories survive, as does the original headquarters {Taylor and Lovie, 2004}.
Site Type: Broad
Industrial Estate
SITEDESC
The Team Valley Trading Estate was established in 1936 - one of the first purpose built industrial estates in the country. It was built as a response to the failure of traditional industry in Gateshead. Nearly £2,000,000 of central government funding was awarded under the Special Areas (Development and Improvement) Act of 1934 into economic regeneration to create a clean pleasant light industrial environment. The resulting TVTE intended to provide employment for 15,000 workers with 15 years. It was masterminded by William G Holford under Colonel Kenelm C Appleyard, formerly of Birtley Iron and Engineering Works, who headed a new company, North Eastern Trading Estates Ltd. Constructed began in 1936 and the estate was formally opened by King George VI three years later. The 650 acre estate is recognised by Pevsner as a remarkable example of planned architecture by W. Holford. The building of the estate involved extensive reclamation works and culverting of the River Team which originally was decorated with trellises and climbing roses. The estate was designed on a grid plan and consists of wide roads and verges. The double row of Wheatley elm on Kingsway North is perhaps the most significant landscape feature. Originally factories were encouraged to create their own garden areas, although sadly there are no remains. In the late 1980s the estate underwent a major environmental improvement scheme in an attempt to attract new development. This scheme by Brian Clouston & Partners reinforced many of the original features, including the replanting of the elm avenue with lime as well as solving unsightly late C20 problems such as the containment of car parking and storage yards.
STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Team Valley Trading Estate was a pioneering solution to the economic depression of the 1930s as the first government industrial estate; with its sponsoring body the first publicly funded Estate Company. Various sites were considered, but the Team Valley was eventually chosen, mainly due to the topography of the site and the excellent transport links by road and rail. The 700 acre site, designed by William G Holford (later Lord Holford and only 29 at the time), was transformed from boggy pasture land using colliery waste. The main north-south axis road, Kingsway, was 2 miles long, and at the time the widest in England. In the vast space was included two 24’ carriageways, with a landscaped strip 24’ wide between, bordered by 4’ grass verges and 6’ cycle tracks, privet hedging and 8’ footpaths. Services were laid in the verges in order to facilitate easy and unobtrusive access. The architect showed a great deal of foresight, as in addition to this generous provision, he ensured all factories were to be set back 30’ from the pavement to allow for ample parking for motor cars, which were rare at the time. Together these would have given a feeling of great openness that was very modern compared with the cramped alleys familiar in the centre of Gateshead. The landscaping also created an attractive setting for the brave new world of light industry, contrasting with the unwholesome and contaminated setting of the heavy industrial past. The intention to look positively to the future is clear. On Kingsway North, a double row of Wheatley Elm is of particular landscape interest, but when the site was officially opened these were but a small part of the planting scheme. 10,000 plants and bulbs were introduced along the full length of Kingsway, including tulips, daffodils, palms and ferns, giving an exotic feel. A narrower east-west axis connected Low Fell and the Ravensworth Coach Road. The dirty River Team (known locally as ‘The Gut’) was cleaned up and canalised to improve the environment, in what was, at the time, the longest river rectification system in England. It was culverted for 100 yards in the centre, but for the first mile, at the south end of Kingsway, its course was diverted into a deep concrete channel, which replaced the central grass strip to the northern end. With aesthetic as well as safety concerns, wire mesh covered these concrete channels, and roses and other climbers were planted to enhance the area. A football ground, tennis courts and a large playing field were originally included in the design, to allow for the recreational and exercise needs of workers. Even the secondary streets were named after elements of the natural world (many trees, but also some birds etc.), presumably in order to bolster the connection with a healthy, natural environment. It is of great importance, too, that a quirkily irregular historic plot known as Twenty Pound Close was retained in the design, with its distinctive woodland character.
There is now a garden behind St George’s House, but more gardens were apparently originally envisaged that were never laid out. This is likely to have been due to the onset of war, as many of the factories were requisitioned and labour and financial resources became restricted. The landscaping scheme, though, remains impressive and is an interesting design of its time, with great potential for restoration and enhancement into the future.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
The Trading Estate came out of the central government’s Special Areas initiative, commissioned to address the problems in those areas worst hit. It was hoped that the introduction of Light Industry would offset the decline in heavy industries. Although there are no gardens as originally envisaged, a renewal scheme in the late 1980s in sympathy with the original design included replanting of avenues of trees and removal of inappropriate intrusions.
MATERIALS / SPECIES Concrete, lawn, Wheatley Elm DESIGNER W G Holford
Roads/services George Wimpey & Co DATES Built 1936 Opened by George VI 22/02/1939
Site Name
Team Valley Trading Estate
Site Type: Specific
Industrial Estate
SITE_STAT
Local List
HER Number
7673
Form of Evidence
Structure
Sources
Fiona Green, 1995, A Guide to the Historic Parks and Gardens of Tyne and Wear, p 56; N. Pevsner (second edition revised by Elizabeth Williamson), 1983, The Buildings of England: County Durham, p 291; S. Taylor and D. Lovie, 2004, Gateshead - Architecture in a Changing English Urban Landscape, pp 6-11; Gateshead Council Local List X20/LLG/24; Grace McCombie, 2009, Newcastle and Gateshead - Pevsner Architectural Guide, p. 35; W H Bevan, The Team Valley Industrial Estate (1976); F W D Manders, A History of Gateshead (1973); W H Bevan, The Team Valley Industrial Estate (1976)